Inbox overload
Messages, referrals, and documents arrive faster than small teams can consistently classify and route.
MyAIPOS connects your inbox, daily work queues, documentation, referrals, billing operations, and owner briefing—then keeps AI inside explicit role, evidence, and human-review boundaries.
Pilot scope is reviewed individually. Public subscription pricing and general availability are not yet published.
The independent-practice problem
Messages, referrals, and documents arrive faster than small teams can consistently classify and route.
Staff move between email, schedules, documents, billing queues, and spreadsheets without a shared operational picture.
Generic automation can create new risk when access, provenance, review, and completion evidence are not built into the workflow.
One operating layer
MyAIPOS is designed as an operations workspace—not a replacement for clinical judgment, a payer, a lab, or the authoritative external system that proves completion.
Bring authorized practice mailboxes into a governed work queue with classification, attachment analysis, and required human review.
See what needs attention across practice operations from one role-aware briefing and worklist.
Prepare structured note sections for clinician review while preserving provider editing and sign-off responsibility.
Coordinate superbills, claim preparation, A/R, denials, and internal follow-up without overstating payer connectivity.
Track intake, documents, ownership, exceptions, and next steps with clear source provenance.
Model diagnostic and administrative workflows from request through verified completion, including exception queues.
Governed workflow
01
Authorized email and operational inputs enter the correct practice workspace.
02
AI proposes classification, summaries, and extracted fields under bounded prompts and source controls.
03
A human compares source evidence with the draft, edits as needed, and approves or rejects.
04
Only permitted actions advance, with audit evidence and clear exceptions when external proof is missing.
Security by workflow design
Access scope, role visibility, audit evidence, minimum-necessary data handling, and explicit human review are part of the product architecture—not a compliance paragraph added later.
Review the security modelNarrow mailbox and role scope, with protected actions enforced on the server.
Immutable, minimum-necessary events record important decisions without copying message content.
Draft-only AI paths remain separate from approval, sending, and authoritative external completion.
Practice and personal Mailroom records remain physically and logically isolated.
Pilot discussion
Public subscription pricing is not yet published. A pilot discussion can evaluate workflow fit, security boundaries, and implementation scope without collecting patient information.